Spinoffs, Not Outcomes
|“In autonomous education, literacy and numeracy are not forced components of a curriculum, but are likely spin-offs within the process and can be acquired in numerous ways, both formal and informal, depending on the child’s questions and developing educational priorities.”|
Moreover, they will be taught according to the educational fashion of the moment and place. If their school happens to favor a method of learning that does not suit their individual best mode of learning, then they will be labeled as slow learners, perhaps put into remedial programs, and certainly be made to feel that it is not the system, but themselves who constitute “the problem.” If the learning method happens to be the one that works for them, they may become functionally literate, but lose any passion for reading, which is now a school chore, not a resource and pleasure.
That reading is a difficult skill requiring years of expert tuition becomes self-fulfilling doctrine that is easily dispelled when the extrinsic pressures are removed. In an environment where children learn to read when they have an intrinsic reason to do so, whether they are three or sixteen years old, and in an environment where adult facilitators help them to find learning resources and processes that suit them as individuals, reading is not difficult and protracted. Sometimes it appears, from the outside, to simply happen; at other times more or less help is required. But it is not a monolithic hurdle guardianed by expert prophets of doom.
This way of learning frees up enormous amounts of time and energy for another kind of education that hardly features in the mainstream – education that concerns itself not with the past, but with the present and the future.
Life contains enormous configurations of knowledge, much of it of amazing depth and complexity. We already know vastly more than can ever be passed on by curricula, but what we know already is not even a fragment of what is still to be discovered. New knowledge is boundless and is simply unavailable to mainstream education, which cannot teach what has not yet been discovered.
Life learning - learning that respects individuality, autonomy, and intrinsic motivation - is above all about new knowledge. It is about creativity, discovery, improvisation, conjecture, and refutation. When the so-called “basics” are not put on over-bearing pedestals that blot out the view of everything else that might be learned (and possible) in life, then our whole way of looking at learning changes.
Mainstream education dislikes this way of looking at learning; not only does it minimize the need for experts, but it is incredibly unpredictable. The mainstream likes predictable outcomes, even if that means predicting that half of children will fail and be written off as hopeless and stupid. The mainstream likes to concern itself with products, with adding value to children by taking public money and parading a few facile equations: 100 children + x amount government spending + eleven years of expert education = 20 top children + 30 middle rank children + 50 compliant, low self esteem drones.
Political and educational careers can subsequently be made by tinkering with the equation. A good government and good teachers might raise the number of top children to 22 and the number of middle rank children to 34. Successful education is input in, outcome achieved.
Embarking on a voyage of discovery in which creativity and improvisation are valued and nurtured is much less predictable and safe. Anything might happen and you won’t know what the range of possible outcomes will be except in retrospect. Even then, you won’t be able to repeat exactly the same voyage with another individual and get the same outcome. Autonomous learning is not about outcomes, but the spin-offs are infinitely varied and involve not only passing on what is already known, but finding out what we didn’t know.
This “spin-offs” rather than “outcomes” approach to learning cannot be based on the old inductive view of learning, but on the premise that true instruction comes from within by a process of trial and error. On such a theory, extrinsic motivation is ruled out as a totally ineffective strategy for learning; rather, intrinsic motivation, problem solving, and improvisation are at the heart of learning.
|“Autonomous education is about having the conditions for self-direction within life. It does not divide life up into education and not-education. There is no one mode of learning that is most conducive to an autonomous, spin-offs approach, but there must be room for the learner to interact with problems to construct his own solutions and ideas.”|
Creative, intrinsically motivated learning makes certain assumptions. Firstly, we have to trust that the learner is best placed to know what best suits her intrinsic motivation to learn...provided that she has a rich and stimulating environment in which to operate as a learner.
Secondly, the child is viewed as an active learner with her own unique set of interests, concerns, questions, and problems, which she is actively addressing at any moment. The role of education is to support this and follow the child/learner’s questions.
Thirdly, the growth of knowledge is viewed as a creative and non-mechanical process within the mind of the learner. An environment with access to a large range of resources, conversation, experiences outside the home, etc., is best placed to nurture and facilitate this process.
Finally, education is about every aspect of learning, every opportunity for conjecture and refutation.
Autonomous education is about having the conditions for self-direction within life. It does not divide life up into education and not-education. There is no one mode of learning that is most conducive to an autonomous, spin-offs approach, but there must be room for the learner to interact with problems to construct his own solutions and ideas. The process of learning is more important than an end product.
Where will that leave those basic skills that pre-occupy and worry mainstream educators so much? It is a core assumption of autonomous education that children will acquire the skills they need to take advantage of their environment and pursue their own aspirations. As such, literacy and numeracy are not forced components of a curriculum, but are likely spin-offs within the process and can be acquired in numerous ways, both formal and informal, depending on the child’s questions and developing educational priorities.
What could be more efficient than a child learning something to suit his or her own intrinsic and individual purposes? What could be more conducive to the growth of knowledge than setting out on a voyage of discovery not knowing what the outcomes will be, but confident that a few more fragments of the infinite amount of new knowledge will be revealed and lead in the next new direction?
Wanting safe, predictable outcomes is humanly understandable, but ultimately limiting; it is the search for new knowledge, with the spin-offs we achieve along the way, that is the model for life long learning.
Dr. Jan Fortune-Wood is a freelance writer & parenting adviser, who home educated her own four children. She is the author of books on home education, autonomous education and non-coercive parenting, including “Doing It Their Way,” “Without Boundaries,” “Bound To Be Free,” and “With Consent.”